David Eby – The Candidate

Who are you?

David Eby, community advocate and NDP canadidate for Vancouver Point Grey in the May 11 byelection.

What do you do for fun?

I like reading, riding my bike and playing music with my band.

What is your favourite community and why?

My favourite community is Vancouver – what a place full of caring, concerned citizens, and what an amazing city! I love my new neighbourhood Kits too, people have been super welcoming and the small and independent businesses give it a vibe all its own.

What is your superpower?

I have go-go-gadget arms, able to reach across rooms without standing up. I’m also told that I have super listening ability, which is a super power I’m particularly proud of.

How do you use this power to build community?

My super listening abilities help me listen to community members while I’m out on the street meeting everyone in my neighbourhood. My extend-o arms help me rescue kittens from trees.

My Three Favourite Things About David Are…

1. He’s wicked smart, but still approachable. Here’s a guy that’s got an incredible grasp of the province’s key political issues. He speaks about them articulately and comprehensibly. In fact, he knows his issues so well that he’s chomping at the bit to take on Premier Christy Clark in a debate that frankly he’d be likely to win (maybe that’s why she’s refusing to debate him). He’s the same guy that you’d easily be able to chat with over pints, who plays in a band (that I hear is pretty awesome) and who has the important (but surprisingly rare ability as a politician) to connect with you as a person vs. only as a voter.

2. He’s a champion of those who most need a champion. We all get to make choices in our life. Instead of heading to Bay Street or West Georgia to practice law in a sparkling high rise, David chose to give voice to the most marginalized and vulnerable citizens of the province. His work as spokesperson for the Pivot Legal Society was important. His time as the Executive Director of the BC Civil Liberties Association was equally impressive. In both cases, David’s choice to put his passion for social justice ahead of megabucks was inspiring. At the fork in the road of life, David certainly took the road less trodden.

3. He sang “Living on a Prayer” to the hundreds of delegates at the NDP convention. Enough said.

Gender equity in the BC NDP rears its head again!

At the annual convention in November 2008, NDP members passed a motion requiring the party to nominate women in 30 per cent of seats not currently held by the party. It was a controversial decision. Proponents argued this would be the only way to increase female representation, an important goal for a party that claimed to be more diverse and representative than the BC Liberals. Opponents felt such a structured approach would lead to the disqualification of qualified male candidates in some ridings in order to meet the “gender quota”, leading to a longterm electoral handicap. In the 2009 election, the NDP surpassed their 30 percent goal; 42 of its 85 candidates were women. Despite this boost in female candidates, the NDP lost the general election.

Now an obscure rule in the NDP’s constitution, which mandates both genders be represented in the party’s top-three positions (leader, president and treasurer), could disqualify some of the top brass including either Moe Sihota (party president) or Bob Smits (party treasurer) should a male candidate win the upcoming leadership race scheduled for this April.

To date the only people who’ve publicly expressed interest are guys making it likely the party will be forced to sacrifice one of its executives on the altar of gender equity.

According to a CKNW interview, Sihota says the executive is well aware of this issue and says it will make a recommendation to the party’s Provincial Council, which will decide the issue in February.

Dana Larsen

With only a few men having publicly expressed interest (namely Dana Larsen and MP Peter Julian) and a bunch of men “seriously considering their options” (namely MLA Mike Farnworth, MLA Bruce Ralston and MLA Adrian Dix)  it is increasingly likely that either Sihota or Smits will be forced to resign. Who’s going to get the boot – Sihota or Smits? Smits has for the most part escaped controversy and media coverage up till now. A Google search turns up very little about him unconnected to this current controversy. The complete opposite could be said for Moe Sihota.

The NDP president has been front and centre of a number of controversies recently. First it was his little earmarked stipend funded by Big Labour, which was embarrassing for a party desperate to show it was a broad progressive tent rather than just the “union party”. Indeed, it was one of the reasons former dissident NDP MLA Jenny Kwan mentioned for her scathing letter that started a rebellion of the baker’s dozen that eventually pushed Carole James out of her position as leader. More recently, Sihota found himself again in hot water when he dismissed the candidacy of Dana Larsen, a  marijuana activist he declared ineligible to run due to his lack membership. Larsen, who ran  federally for the New Democrats, resigned voluntarily as a federal candidate in 2008 after he made headlines for a series of YouTube videos showing him taking LSD and smoking dozens of marijuana cigarettes.

The decision to block Larsen was good policy, but bad politics. No one thinks Larsen is a legitimate candidate for the NDP leadership (with the exception of perhaps Larsen), but to have him parading around and intermingling his brand with the NDP’s for a week or two before more serious candidates came to the fore was a nightmare for the NDP brass. Comparisons to the current BC Liberal race and their high quality candidates no doubt added to the embarrassments. But Sihota’s unilateral attempt to block Larsen  added fuel to the fire of a candidate who was already a radical outsider. Sure enough, within a few days of Larsen complaining the “NDP brasses’ heavy handed moves” he was forced to back off. According to a recent CTV story, Larsen says Sihota recently apologized to him for claiming he was not eligible to seek the NDP’s top job.

But does he want to stay on as president or will Bob Smits be forced to resign. According to Sihota, “that decision will be discussed between myself and the rest of the executive and we’ll let you guys know.”

BC’s Political Twilight Zone

Dramatic events of yore

It has been a whirlwind ride here in the BC political world. In the past month, both major parties have seen their foundations’ shaken, first by open and often embarrassing dissent and then with the resignation of their leaders after years of service.

For Gordon Campbell, resignation came only after a last ditch significant tax cut he announced on Global TV at vast public expense. A week later, his final gambit having failed to put any dent in his rock bottom popularity (around 12% according to a Angus Reid poll), he called a surprise press conference and announced he was quitting. Then Bill Bennett happened. The Liberal Mining Minister was furious the departing Premier wouldn’t be going anywhere until a future undetermined leadership convention could be called. For Bennett (and truth be told many other party members), a lingering Campbell wasn’t going to help anyone – especially considering his toxic approval rating. Each time he’d show up, it was another reminder of the hated HST, the legacy of which the BC Liberals were forced to carry around like a political Bubonic Plague.

Never one to be pushed around, Campbell made an example of the dissident. Through cabinet, he arranged to have him tossed out. His Deputy Minister Colin Hanson swore it was caucus solidarity that got Bennett ejected. But the writing was on the wall; and so was Campbell’s signature on Bennett`s cabinet decapitation. Incensed, Bennett headed to the steps of the legislature and unleashed a tirade that left even longtime government watchers like Vaughn Palmer aghast.

He’s a bully who’s left spittle on my face because he was yelling so loudly at me, he said. The liberal caucus suffers from “battered wife syndrome”, he complained. For 40 minutes he ranted and raved. It was manna from heaven for political reporters.

As the BC Liberals continued to implode, something strange was happening on the other side of the political river. Polling told a story that everyone watching BC politics knew. Carole James and the BC NDP’s popularity seemed contingent only on the ill-will the public held towards the Premier. With Campbell promising to make himself disappear, suddenly, approval ratings for the NDP started to slip. Soon there was not nearly the same approval gap that was the signature of the Premier’s nightmarish HST-days (though the NDP was still ahead at the time). A dissident group of MLAs, who had only uttered a peep (or three) of protest after MLA Bob Simpson was booted for not apologizing for a mild criticism of the fearless leader in a small online publication a month or so earlier, began to organize and vent. Blood was in the water and the party was struck by a series of high profile resignations – first caucus chair Norm MacDonald and then caucus whip Katrina Conroy. Standing mutely by and refusing to answer any questions of whether she supported James or not was Jenny Kwan – legendary MLA of Mt Pleasant and one of the two survivors of the NDP electoral bloodbath following the deeply troubled  2001 provincial election. Kwan wasn’t a happy camper and neither were 12 other dissident MLAs who felt Jame’s style was divisive. As always in politics, you can be as abrasive and egotistical as you want if you’re winning. However if you aren’t – watch out.

By November, polling showed James’ own personal approval at only 25 per cent, despite her party being favoured by 47 per cent of voters — leaving a massive 22 per cent credibility gap. It was becoming increasingly obvious to many watchers that James wasn’t going to be able to carry them to victory in the next election. Add to that the disaffection many of the party’s staunch left wingers felt for James’ efforts to move the party away from labour activism and towards the business community leanings and you had a recipe for mutiny.

Following the round of resignations by Conroy and MacDonald and the growing rumblings among a number of constituency associations calling for a leadership convention and/or her head, James used the year’s provincial council meeting (which brings together local riding delegates from around the province) to try to somehow shore up support. Pro-Carole forces were handed out yellow scarfs (left over symbols from her leadership battle many eons ago) to differentiate them from the dissidents. The grassroots delegates overwhelmingly endorsed James, who summarily turned around, called for unity and denounced any future mutinous rumblings. Time to come together as New Democrats and show the people of BC we’re fit to govern, she said.

Unity? Not for long. A few days later, not content to let sleeping dogs lie, Kwan released a statement to the press that was 10 times more critical than Simpson’s. She attacked James’ leadership, her style and her methods. Ironically, it had been Kwan who had first nominated James to be leader. Brutus stuck the knife in deep and many people frustrated with James’ leadership silently cheered.

Rallying support, James took a weekend to consider what to do with the Kwan and the rest of her Baker’s Dozen rebels (as they had been labeled). She was between a rock and hard place. Boot Kwan and it was apparent 1/3 of her caucus could walk to, crippling the NDP and the leader. If she let Kwan stay, her power and authority would be hobbled like never before. In the final hours of labour initiated  negotiation with the dissidents proved unfruitful.  Her ultimate decision to resign as leader nevertheless was even more shocking than Campbell’s decision to quit.

In her wake, she left her party divided and bitter, without any potential high-profile actors ready to step into the fray. Meanwhile the BC Liberal race was kicking into high gear as Kevin Falcon and talk show host Christy Clark jumped into the fray to compete with Moira Stillwell, George Abbott and Mike de Jong.

What does the future hold?

On the right side of the spectrum, Kevin Falcon has come out as the apparent front runner, sowing up a large number of BC Liberal MLAs and organizers – many of whom he’s worked with for much of the past decade. In addition to a hefty profile as Health Minister (and before that Transportation Minister), he’s got significant backing from the rural elements (note his dual announcement in Vancouver and then Prince George) of the BC Liberal party – that and lots of money from mid-sized BC business and certain big development groups. The heir apparent of the right’s main competitor is Christy Clark, who probably has an equal level of profile and the prowess of operatives like her ex-husband Mark Marissen, brother Bruce Clark (both of whom are well known federal Liberal organizers) as well as Patrick Kinsella, a well known federal Conservative strategist. Abbott, Stillwell and de Jong fall on the fringes, though Abbott has managed to snag a significant number of supporters early on before Clark entered the race.

Should Clark prevail it’s speculated many conservative members of the BC Liberals may walk over to the BC Conservative party. Bad news for the BC Liberals, but good news for the province’s political landscape if you ask me. If Falcon wins, it will only reaffirm what many progressives already know, that the BC Liberal party is a right of centre party (not a middle of the road one).

On the left side of the spectrum the lines are yet drawn. Some people are whispering the name of NDP MP Peter Julian as a future leadership contender. Mike Farnworth – a moderate middle of the road dipper hasn’t ruled it out. Spencer Herbert who represents the NDP stronghold in the West End has also said he’s considering a run. And then there is Vancouver Mayor Gregor Robertson, who despite being an excellent candidate for the job (if only because he’s distanced from the whole James mess) isn’t likely to jump in. Another couple years it would be a distinct possibility, but the timing just doesn’t seem right.

And what of Vision BC that people talk about moving into the vacuume that is BC progressive provincial politics? Don’t hold your breath. Vision’s appeal (and issues) – while powerful in Vancouver – does not necessarily translate outside of the Lower Mainland. More importantly in order to win in elections parties fundamentally need both money and organizers. Ideas are important, but they are often secondary. The challenge for any Vision BC wouldn’t be money – there’s a whole raft of business interests that could supplement the dip in labour funding the party would surely face should it have to take on both the NDP and Liberals provincially. The biggest issue would be organizers. While Vision has in the past relied heavily on the green/bike riding/eco-business/progressive professional crowd – outside of the Lower Mainland, there are far fewer of these individuals to draw on. These forces have traditionally been strongly augmented by labour organizers who are often seconded to a campaign. Most, if not all, are strongly connected to the NDP and do the same thing provincially and federally as they do in municipal elections. To effectively organize outside the Lower Mainland, a Vision BC would be strongly reliant on these skilled workers, many of whom are lifer New Democrats. Splitting them away from the mother-ship would be very difficult.

Ultimately, there are many big questions that should become more clear in the coming months. As the BC Liberal leadership race heats up, so to will the pressure on the NDP to get a new leader – and quick. Who that’ll be, and how that will effect the political landscape is anyone’s guess. But I for one am looking forward to seeing it all unfold.

BC’s Conservatives and Political Diversity in BC

bc-conservatives-logoThe implosion of political parties isn’t anything new to BC politics.

Over my lifetime, we’ve seen the total destruction of the Socreds and the near total destruction of the BCNDP a half a decade later here in BC.

All of this has left Gordon Campbell and the BC Liberals sitting pretty on the centre right of the spectrum, unchallenged and secure in power in Victoria. But like any party, as they rule, they’ve slowly, but surely, managed to alienate many right wing voters who’d rallied to their cause in the early years due to total lack of options on the political right.

Hate the BC Liberals and their iron clawed fiscal management style? Fair enough. However, you’d be hard pressed to peg the leader (Mr. GC himself) as especially socially conservative fellow.

The Once Glorious Leader.

The Once Glorious Leader.

Enter Wilf Hanni – now former leader of the BC Conservative party – a upstart political entity loosely aligned with the Conservative Party of Canada.

That’s right – BC really does have a conservative party. Didn’t know they existed? Neither did I until fairly recently.

These folks are interesting. According to the party website, they’re in the game to: “strive for a province that is progressive for the benefit of all individuals. A long-term objective of self-sustaining government that does not rely on personal income tax for its operating needs.”

How this conservative crew plans on offering health care or a decent educational system without income tax is beyond me – but perhaps that’s the point. If you’re rich and aren’t paying taxes, what do you need public education for?

Anyway, Hanni has a past you’d expect of a conservative politician occupying, not the centre right, but the right of the political spectrum.

He’s a former leader of the Reform Party of BC and oil industry consultant. In 2006, he was elected to lead the BC Conservative Party. At that time the BC Conservatives were about as well known as the Nude Garden Party. They lacked just about everything (organizers, funding, big name endorsements, grassroots members) that a contending political organization requires to make a good showing in the polls. Unsurprisingly, they went on to lose the next election badly. However, despite their defeat, they managed to triple the number of votes they got this time around.

However, only a few months after their latest defeat, fearless leader Hanni himself decided to take off, bringing what seems like half the organization’s board of directors with him. That’s bad news for any organization, but for a fledgling political party, a split like that can be devastating. Hanni references personal and political differences and an inability to work with some of the more uncompromising elements of his party. This regularly seems to be the case with many fringe parties.

To be perfectly honest, I’m very disappointed in this news. Not because as some might think (I’m looking at you co-editor) I’m a closet conservative. No, my disappointment is rooted in a somewhat more convoluted reason.

For one thing, having more legitimate, rather than fringe choices is a good thing in a democracy (ie. It’d be great to see more/any BC Greens in the legislature). More importantly though, I’d hoped that if BC had a real right wing party, the BC Liberals might be persuaded to becoming a bit more, well, “liberal”. That’s the dream anyway, one which seems to be becoming more of a pipe dream than anything else. Ultimately, as long as the centre and right wing of BC politics remain united, Mr. Campbell’s BC Liberals will continue to shy away from a progressive agenda. Afterall, when your cart works fine, why re-invent the wheel?

Despite all this I continue to hold out hope that one day fortune or backroom deals (either one, I’m not too picky) will yield a bit more diversity in our political community.  That’d be a good thing for everyone.